MAWPS Initiative and Structure

The Case for Inclusion

Efforts to enhance women’s meaningful participation in peace processes, peacekeeping, and post-conflict reconstruction are rooted in several principles. We support an approach based on the inalienable human rights that women possess, and on the need to change power dynamics and secure broad gender equality in political, socioeconomic, and security terms. At the same time, clear empirical evidence from UN Women and other institutions has shown what participants in peace and reconstruction processes have long known: peace agreements that involve a critical mass of empowered women and women’s organizations are more easily negotiated and far more likely to build peaceful, just, stable, and prosperous post-conflict societies than those that do not. The same research shows that women have made up only 1 in 13 participants in peace processes over the past 25 years, and that most peace agreements pay insufficient attention to gender-related issues and challenges.

The advantages of women’s engagement are many. In addition to expanding the talent pool available to contribute to these processes, women often bring to the table unique and essential ground truth, longer-term perspectives, and a focus on socioeconomic root causes of conflicts. They know that the cost of returning to conflict is tragic in human and resource terms and poses a global security threat. Countries faced with instability due in part to marginalizing women are more likely to traffic in drugs, people, and weapons; send off large numbers of refugees across borders and oceans; incubate and transmit pandemic diseases; harbor criminal networks and terrorists; and require foreign military engagement and humanitarian assistance.

Many outstanding civil society and international organizations are committed to advancing women’s engagement in the peace and security sector. They have helped change norms, regulations, and attitudes of senior leaders throughout the United Nations and other international institutions, NGOs, and national governments that support peace processes and peacekeeping missions. In addition to UN Security Council Resolution 1325 and its successors, many national governments have adopted National Action Plans and legislation to promote this agenda. For example, in October 2017, the US Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017 was signed into law, requiring the US government to adopt a national policy in support of women’s empowerment and engagement. Civil society has also conducted research on best practices and has provided “tool kits,” technical support and advice, and training modules for governments designing NAPs and others implementing engendered programs.

Bringing Men Into The Fight

It is understandable and appropriate that these groups, as well as participants at conferences on gender and conflict, have largely consisted of women advocates, activists, academics, and political leaders. While individual men have expressed supportive views, and some organizations have been formed in related areas (e.g., UN Women’s “He for She” to gain high-profile male supporters for gender equality), the collective voice of men has been largely absent in the peace and security space. A recent report from Our Secure Future in October 2017, entitled “Not the Usual Suspects: Engaging Male Champions of Women, Peace and Security,” notes,

[quote frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen="" mozallowfullscreen="" allowfullscreen="">

While men still dominate leadership roles within national and international security structures, they have remained on the sidelines of the Women, Peace and Security movement.

[/quote]

This absence reinforces the impression that these are “women’s issues” or somehow of lesser importance than “hard” security issues, when in fact they are vitally important and impact all of us. Harmful versions of masculinity are also a source of conflict, driving men’s violence against women and impeding women’s full access to rights and opportunities. MAWPS will engage male and female leaders to speak out against such views of manhood and in favor of equitable and nonviolent attitudes and behaviors.

What We Are Doing?

[col different_values="0" desktop="2"]
[image fid="664" hover="0" different_values="0" extra_classes="img-responsive"]

[col desktop="8" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen="" mozallowfullscreen="" allowfullscreen="">

Mobilizing Male Allies for Women, Peace and Security (MAWPS) is building a network that raises the collective voices of men and women for the WPS agenda. We have discussed the initiative and received encouragement from more than 100 existing institutions, including UN Women, Alliance for Peacebuilding, Dartmouth University’s Dickey Center for International Understanding, Georgetown Center for Women, Peace and Security, Institute for Inclusive Security, InterAction, International Youth Federation, Norwegian Refugee Council, Promundo, Stevenson Group, Women’s Foreign Policy Network, Women’s Refugee Commission, and World Learning.

[col different_values="0" desktop="2"]
[image fid="663" hover="0" different_values="0" extra_classes="img-responsive"]

[col desktop="8" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen="" mozallowfullscreen="" allowfullscreen="">

MAWPS is organizing and mobilizing an Advocacy Coalition of distinguished men and women, global figures from the defense, development, diplomacy, civil society, and business worlds who have shown an understanding and commitment to this agenda. The institution and network are partnering with other organizations and draw on administrative support from Our Secure Future.

We are now engaging in consultations with a wide variety of global stakeholders in order to adopt a Charter—a clear, concise, and convincing statement of their common commitment to an engendered approach to global security issues, including peace and post-conflict recovery processes.

[col different_values="0" desktop="2"]
[image fid="665" hover="0" different_values="0" extra_classes="img-responsive"]

[col desktop="8" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen="" mozallowfullscreen="" allowfullscreen="">

The process of drafting the Charter is inclusive and is ensuring buy-in and ownership of participants, including grassroots advocates in conflict-affected countries. The Charter will advocate concrete, time-bound, and measurable goals to achieve these objectives. Examples of suggestions now being discussed include the following:

a. Require immediately a minimum of 30 percent women’s participation in peace negotiations, peacekeeping missions, and post-conflict reconstruction processes as a precondition for international support, with the percentage of women’s engagement rising each year toward the eventual goal of 50-50 gender representation.

b. Insist that post-conflict recovery packages adopt a gender lens and include

30 percent funding for issues related to basic human security, such as health care,

education, and psychosocial support for survivors of violence.

c. Engage UN Women more prominently in the peacemaking and peacebuilding

agenda, including through designating high-level gender advisors on all missions; in this regard, raise total voluntary contributions from member states to $500 million per year, as was originally envisioned.

d. Establish a permanent UN Security Council working group on women and armed

conflict, enhancing the informal group of experts on WPS with the power to require periodic reports, name and shame, and sanction countries and non-state actors that fail to meet their obligations.

e. Require training in sexual harassment and gender equitable workplaces for all men and women in peace operations, especially those in leadership roles.